CHOP overview

CHOP at a glance

Full titleCanadian Handbook of Practice for Architects
PublisherRoyal Architectural Institute of Canada (RAIC)
Current editionThird Edition, a project the RAIC and the provincial and territorial associations began in 2018. The ExAC Preparation Guide names the 2020 edition; the RAIC's live web edition at chop.raic.ca, sometimes referenced as CHOP 2025, is the same Third Edition kept current.
Earlier editionsFirst Edition 1999 and Second Edition spring 2009, with a 1976 handbook before those
LanguagesEnglish and French
Primary audiencePractising architects, intern architects, and architectural students
Where to accessThrough the RAIC. Check raic.org for current access terms.

Why CHOP matters for the ExAC

CHOP is one of the four primary reference documents the 2026 ExAC Preparation Guide names for the exam as a whole. The guide does not map references to individual categories, so the alignment on this page is Examitect's own: we lean on CHOP most heavily for every category in Section 4 (Construction and practice), and treat it as supporting reading for Section 1 (Design and analysis) and Section 3 (Sustainability and final project). If a question asks who holds the contract, what the architect's obligations are during construction, how fees are typically structured, or how to handle a change order, the answer almost always traces back to a CHOP chapter.

The handbook also shapes the language the ExAC uses. Phrases like "general review," "field review," "instrument of service," "prime consultant," and "scope of architectural services" come straight from CHOP and the contracts CHOP discusses. Reading CHOP closely helps you recognize those terms quickly under exam pressure and gives you a vocabulary that matches how the questions are written.

If you only had time to read one architectural-practice reference before the ExAC, CHOP would be it.

How to study CHOP for the ExAC

  • Skim cover to cover once so you know where things live, then go deep on Parts 3, 5, and 6 (practice management, design project management, and the project phases).
  • Tab the chapters on scope of services, general review, contracts, fees, and project closeout. Those topics return on the exam over and over.
  • Read CHOP alongside CCDC 2 and RAIC Documents 6 and 9. CHOP cites them constantly, and the ExAC tests how the three documents interact.
  • Write a one-page summary for each chapter you flag. The act of summarizing forces you to compress long-form material into exam-ready answers.
  • Test recall with scenario-based practice questions. CHOP knowledge sticks faster when you apply it to a project situation than when you re-read passages.
  • Schedule one CHOP-only week if you can spare it. A concentrated pass builds connections between chapters that get lost when reading is spread thin.

ExAC sections CHOP supports

  1. Section 1

    CHOP is a useful supporting reference for the foundational design categories.

  2. Section 3

    CHING is the main resource here, but CHOP is an important supporting reference for technical and sustainability topics.

  3. Section 4

    Examitect leans on CHOP for every Section 4 category. This is where it carries the most weight.

Six Parts inside CHOP

CHOP is built around six top-level Parts, which together contain 39 chapters. Each Part addresses a different layer of practice, moving from the philosophy of the profession through to the day a project is handed over. Knowing the shape of the handbook makes it much faster to find what you need on study night. The exam mapping in the third column is Examitect's own study mapping, since the Preparation Guide does not cite CHOP chapters against objectives. Click any Part or chapter link below to open it on the RAIC site.

CHOP PartWhat it coversWhere it lands on the ExACChapters
CHOP: Part 1Theory and Background The architectural profession, ethics, regulation, education, accreditation, and the national and international organizations that shape Canadian practice. Section 4 (Project Management cites Chapters 1.2 through 1.7); Section 3 (Sustainable Design Literacy cites 1.1).
CHOP: Part 2The Context of Practice Contracts and legal frameworks, client relations, RFPs and procurement, consultant coordination, authorities having jurisdiction, and industry standards. Sections 1, 3, and 4 (engineering coordination, materials, document coordination, bidding, and construction field functions).
CHOP: Part 3Management of the Architectural Practice Business planning, financial management, office policies, employment, quality management, risk and insurance, scope of architectural services, and special architect roles. Section 1 and Section 4 (Cost Management cites 3.4 and 3.9; Project Management cites most of Part 3).
CHOP: Part 4The Design Construction Program Project delivery methods (design-bid-build, design-build, construction management, integrated project delivery) and construction cost estimating. Section 1 and Section 4 (Cost Management cites 4.2; Project Management cites 4.1).
CHOP: Part 5Management of the Design Project Project management checklists, communication and documentation, meeting management, quality control, integrated design, retrofitting, and design sustainability. Sections 1, 3, and 4 (engineering coordination, building science, document coordination, sustainable design, construction administration).
CHOP: Part 6Phases of the Design Project Site analysis, schematic design, design development, construction documents, tender, general review, project completion, and specialized compliance documents. Sections 1, 3, and 4 (cited across programming, site analysis, schematic, design development, construction docs, bidding, and construction phase).

If you're short on time, Parts 3, 5, and 6 carry the heaviest exam load. Part 4 is shorter but high-yield for cost and delivery questions. Parts 1 and 2 are worth one careful read for context and for the Project Management category in Section 4.

Key CHOP terms every ExAC candidate should know

CHOP introduces vocabulary that the ExAC reuses without redefining. Learn these terms early so you spend exam time choosing the answer, not parsing the question.

TermWhat it means in CHOPWhere to read in CHOP
Instrument of service The drawings, specifications, and other documents an architect prepares. They remain the architect's intellectual property under most Canadian agreements.
General review The periodic review of construction by the architect of record to determine, in general, whether the work conforms to the construction documents. Required by most provincial regulators when an architect is the architect of record.
Field review Synonymous with general review. CHOP says so outright, and lists field review, general review, site review, and site observations as names for the same field functions, with different provincial regulators preferring different terms. A closer, continuous presence on site is a separate service, continuous on-site representation, and supervision and inspection are different levels of service again that the architect does not normally provide.
Scope of services The defined list of tasks the architect agrees to perform, typically structured as basic services, additional services, and excluded services.
Architect of record The licensed architect who takes professional responsibility for the project and seals the documents submitted to the authority having jurisdiction.
Prime consultant and sub-consultant CHOP's terms for the consultant team. The prime consultant, usually the architect, holds the agreement with the client and coordinates the sub-consultants, each of whom takes professional responsibility for their own portion of the work.
Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) The body that adopts, enforces, or interprets the building code or other regulations in a given location.
Schedule of fees The agreed structure for compensating the architect: percentage of construction cost, lump sum, hourly rate, or unit rate.
Substantial performance The point in construction, defined by provincial construction or builders' lien legislation, at which the project is sufficiently complete to be used for its intended purpose. Triggers holdback release.
Ready-for-Takeover Under CCDC 2 (2020) GC 12.1.1, the point at which eight prerequisites are met: substantial performance certified or verified, evidence of compliance for occupancy, final cleaning and waste removal, operation and maintenance documents delivered, as-built drawings available on site, startup and testing complete for immediate occupancy, secured access provided to the owner, and demonstration and training scheduled. The contractor delivers a comprehensive list of items still to be completed or corrected at the same moment, so deficiencies are expressly outstanding at Ready-for-Takeover. The point at which the contractor has fulfilled every obligation is final payment under GC 5.5.
Project closeout The final phase covering substantial performance, deficiency lists, Ready-for-Takeover, holdback release, warranties, and as-built documentation turnover.
Standard of care The level of skill and diligence a reasonably competent architect would apply in similar circumstances. The benchmark used to judge professional liability.

Tips for Intern Architects reading CHOP

CHOP was written for a working architect, not a student. If you're early in your internship under the Internship in Architecture Program (IAP) or its provincial equivalent, here's how to read CHOP without losing momentum.

Tip 1, read it in passes, not in one sit. Treat the first pass as a skim. Read the table of contents and the first page of every chapter. You're mapping the territory, not memorizing it. Save the deep read for chapters tied to whatever you're doing at work right now.

Tip 2, tie each chapter to a real project. The handbook becomes ten times stickier when you can match an idea to a moment on a live project. When you read about change orders, picture the last RFI you watched a senior architect handle. That pattern recognition is exactly what the ExAC tests.

Tip 3, learn the contract trio in parallel. CCDC 2 (owner-contractor), RAIC Document 6 (client-architect), and RAIC Document 9 (architect-consultant) are referenced throughout CHOP. Pull the actual contract documents up while you read the chapters that discuss them. The ExAC tests how these documents interact, not just what they say in isolation.

Tip 4, build your own one-page summaries. For each chapter you flag as exam-critical, write a one-page summary in your own words. Most candidates who pass say this single habit moved them faster than any other study technique.

Tip 5, ask your supervising architect to walk you through one project. Use CHOP's project phases (Part 6) as the structure. Ask them how each phase actually played out on a recent project, where it deviated from the textbook, and why. The conversation gives you stories you can anchor exam answers to.

Tip 6, don't memorize, internalize. The ExAC asks scenario questions, not definitions. You won't be asked "what does CHOP say about general review." You'll be given a situation and asked what the architect should do next. Read CHOP looking for principles you can apply, not facts you can recite.

Tip 7, track your IAP hours against CHOP chapters. Many of the IAP experience categories map directly to CHOP Parts. If you find a gap (for example, no exposure to construction administration), flag it with your mentor and target a project that fills it.

Common ExAC scenarios where CHOP is the answer

These question types come up across ExAC sittings. If you see one, your first instinct should be to ask "what does CHOP say."

  • A contractor sends an RFI pointing to a discrepancy between drawings and specifications. What is the architect's responsibility?
  • A consultant misses a coordination item that surfaces during framing. Who issues the change directive, and on what authority?
  • The client asks the architect to reduce fees in exchange for limiting general review. What are the professional risks?
  • Substantial performance is declared and the contractor requests release of holdback. What documentation does the architect need to see first?
  • A user group requests a change that adds six percent to the project budget. What's the appropriate procedure for processing it through schematic design?
  • The architect of record receives a complaint from a third party who was injured during construction. What is the immediate obligation?
  • A subconsultant produces a deliverable that does not meet the standard of care. What action does CHOP recommend the prime architect take?

Each scenario traces back to a CHOP chapter. Part 3 (risk and scope), Part 5 (communication and quality), and Part 6 (construction documents through closeout) carry most of the load.

How CHOP compares to other ExAC references

CHOP is the practice spine of Examitect's ExAC reading list, but it doesn't stand alone. Use this comparison to decide what to read for which kind of question.

ReferenceWhat it's forHow CHOP relates
CHOPThe full landscape of Canadian architectural practice: profession, business, project delivery, and every project phase.The reference standard for practice topics on the ExAC.
CCDC 2 (Stipulated Price Contract)The standard contract between owner and contractor, including the agreement, definitions, and general conditions.CHOP explains how an architect administers a CCDC 2 project. CCDC 2 is the legal text itself.
CCDC 24Prequalification of contractors and supporting model forms (change process, application for payment).CHOP frames when and why prequalification is used; CCDC 24 supplies the form templates.
RAIC Document 6Standard form of contract between client and architect, plus Supplementary Conditions.CHOP describes how to scope, fee, and administer the relationship Document 6 sets up.
RAIC Document 9Standard form of contract between architect and consultant, used for sub-consultant agreements, plus Supplementary Conditions.CHOP frames consultant coordination and the prime architect's responsibilities; Document 9 is the contract you sign with each sub-consultant.
NBC 2020The national model building code: technical compliance rules.Different jobs. CHOP covers the code research workflow and the AHJ relationship; the NBC carries the provisions themselves. The NBC is the primary reference for ExAC Section 2, not CHOP.
NECBThe national model energy code for buildings.CHOP touches sustainability and design responsibility; the NECB carries the energy compliance rules.
CHING (Building Construction Illustrated)Building science, assemblies, materials, and detailing.CHOP is how a project runs; CHING is how a wall is built. Different jobs, both tested.
Yardsticks and RSMeansConstruction cost data for early-stage estimating.CHOP covers the architect's role in cost management; the cost references give you the actual numbers.

How Examitect reinforces CHOP

Reading CHOP is half the work. The other half is recognizing the content under pressure on a timed exam. Examitect's question bank draws heavily from CHOP for Section 4 questions and for the practice-management content in Sections 1 and 3. Each answer explanation points back to the specific CHOP chapter, so you can re-read just the few pages you need rather than the whole book.

You also get scenario-based questions that put CHOP's checklists into a real project context, full-length mock exams that mirror ExAC pacing, and free study notes for every section. Try a few sample questions first, then check pricing when you want the full bank.

FAQ

CHOP FAQ

CHOP is the Royal Architectural Institute of Canada's handbook on the practice of architecture in Canada. It covers business planning, project delivery, contracts, the architect's role on site, and professional ethics, and the 2026 ExAC Preparation Guide names it as one of four primary reference documents for the exam.

Yes. The 2026 ExAC Preparation Guide names CHOP (2020 edition) as one of four primary reference documents, alongside the Internship in Architecture Program, NBC 2020, and NECB 2020. The guide does not assign references to individual categories. In Examitect's own mapping, CHOP carries the most weight in Section 4 (Construction and practice), with supporting use in Section 1 (Design and analysis) and Section 3 (Sustainability and final project). Section 2 (Codes) is covered by the NBC and NECB rather than CHOP.

Section 4 (Construction and practice). Examitect maps CHOP to every Section 4 category, including bidding and contracts, construction office functions, construction field functions, and project management. It is also useful supporting reading for many Section 1 and Section 3 categories.

The current edition is the Third Edition. The RAIC and the provincial and territorial associations began the project in 2018, and it superseded the First Edition of 1999 and the Second Edition of spring 2009. The ExAC 2026 Preparation Guide names the 2020 edition of CHOP, and the RAIC's live web edition at chop.raic.ca, sometimes called CHOP 2025, is the same Third Edition kept current. That is the version ExAC candidates should be studying.

Skim once for the shape of the handbook, then go deep on Parts 3, 5, and 6. Tab the chapters on scope of services, general review, contracts, and project closeout. Read CHOP alongside CCDC 2 and RAIC Document 6, and test yourself with scenario-based practice questions.

CCDC 2 is the standard stipulated price contract between owner and contractor. CHOP is the practice reference that explains how an architect administers a CCDC 2 project, including general review, payment certification, change orders, and substantial performance. The ExAC tests both.

Time varies widely with prior work experience. Candidates with limited construction administration exposure usually spend more time on Parts 3, 5, and 6 than candidates who already handle CA work day to day. Pair the reading with scenario-based practice questions to convert recognition into recall.

RAIC Document 6 is the standard form of contract between client and architect. RAIC Document 9 is the standard form of contract between architect and consultant, used for sub-consultant agreements. Both are referenced throughout CHOP and tested on the ExAC.